In partnership with
Daily wrap
Smart Investors Don’t Guess. They Read The Daily Upside.
Markets are moving faster than ever — but so is the noise. Between clickbait headlines, empty hot takes, and AI-fueled hype cycles, it’s harder than ever to separate what matters from what doesn’t.
That’s where The Daily Upside comes in. Written by former bankers and veteran journalists, it brings sharp, actionable insights on markets, business, and the economy — the stories that actually move money and shape decisions.
That’s why over 1 million readers, including CFOs, portfolio managers, and executives from Wall Street to Main Street, rely on The Daily Upside to cut through the noise.
No fluff. No filler. Just clarity that helps you stay ahead.
Editor’s picks
In this episode, the focus is on women who have transitioned into a career as barristers. It explores their experiences, the challenges they have encountered, and the rewarding moments that come with life at the Bar.
Hayne and the hordes: Ex-High Court judge queues for mushroom event [The Age paywall]
Even a former top judge can’t resist the mushroom murders.
The court does not accept that the burden on the freedom of political communication is substantial or that the impugned law has a very chilling effect on free speech. In short it does not accept the “nature and intensity” (Brown v Tasmania per Gageler J at [146]) advocated by the defendant. The impugned law is directed at specific historical symbols. It is worth repeating people are still free to express an opinion in many ways that the contemporary conduct of Israel should be equated Nazi Germany. However if the communication involves displaying a Nazi symbol in public, then the conduct is assessed in light of the purposes of the impugned law. The defendant’s submission about the nature and intensity of the burden arguably overstates the importance of Nazi symbols in political communication in Australia.
We’d love your help shaping Headnote.
Got feedback or ideas? Want to work with us?
Hit reply!