- Headnote
- Posts
- Justice Meek quotes Goldilocks and Oliver Twist
Justice Meek quotes Goldilocks and Oliver Twist
In Larocca v Alvarez & Marsal Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 687 Meek J weaves in some Goldilocks and Oliver Twist quotes.

Daily wrap
Judge references Oliver Twist, Goldilocks in EY win over defections [AFR paywall]
The firm won the right for a trove of documents over the defection of partners to a rival in a case likened to the expression “Please, sir, I want some more”.
Larocca v Alvarez & Marsal Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 687 (1 July 2025)
[3] Fairy tale analogies, much less fairy tale endings, are not generally the vernacular readily invoked in contested litigation involving international tax firms. Yet the “Goldilocks Zone” was parlance deployed by EY’s senior counsel to explain a dilemma in the case. Put simply, he contends that EY knows enough to be concerned but not enough to make a sensible and informed decision about whether or not to commence substantive proceedings against the defendants.
[4] In Goldilocks terms, he contends that EY’s knowledge (a word which I note rhymes with porridge) “is just right”, allowing for a fairly broad scope of “temperature”. In Southey’s original story, the porridge of Wee Bear being “just right” was a close to ideal state, but did not satiate the old Woman as the little porridge-pot “did not hold enough for her”. Unlike Goldilocks, but like the old woman, EY wants more information or knowledge. Pressing the literary porridge theme imperfectly further, essentially EY comes to the Court, a little like Oliver Twist saying “Please sir, I want more [gruel]”, i.e. here the request is for more knowledge.
[see also footnotes for above paras]
Hunter Valley bus crash driver Brett Button appeals against 32-year jail sentence - ABC News
Like our newsletter?
Chances are, someone you know will too.
Editor’s picks
On a wet and stormy winter night, a powerful assembly gathered at Parliament House, Sydney, not just to commemorate a century since the first female solicitor was admitted in New South Wales, but to ignite a "call to arms" for the next 100 years of gender equality in the legal profession.
Courts set pace on AI [Capital Brief paywall]
With parliaments slow to act — or not acting at all — courts have stepped in to police AI use and catch out litigants.
Dawson Davies | Solictors & Barristors | Deceased Estate Administration
Dawson Davies prides itself on defining our own professional legal standards—with our esteemed Mr. Dawson boasting over 133 years of experience, dedicated exclusively to simple matters and local Western Australian laws.
For our beloved master Mr. Dawson, everything is always very simple. Whether it's ignoring correspondence, dismissing opposing views, or ensuring that even the most straightforward legal matters become unnecessarily complex and lost along the way - you can count on Dawson Davies to approach every case with the same level of care and attention to detail with our Ironclad Commitment to Non-Commitment.
Explore the Law Partnership Survey results for the first half of 2025 [AFR paywall]
Firms are performing strongly, thanks to demand for advice around corporate disputes, energy transition and infrastructure deals.
Revealed: The law firms that have grown (and shrunk) the most [AFR paywall]
Strong demand for corporate dispute, energy transition and infrastructure legal advice has created a two-speed legal market.
Page v Long [2025] VCC 868 (27 June 2025)
[19] In his written submissions, Mr Long also relied upon 13 cases said to support the proposition that, in civil trespass proceedings, courts require convincing circumstantial evidence to show that the defendant was likely responsible for the trespass. Of these, 11 of the cited cases did not exist (some had citations similar to genuine cases, but none of these cases concerned the use of circumstantial evidence)…
[20] It is likely these cases are another example of a litigant’s misplaced reliance upon generative AI to assist them in preparing submissions…
What happens inside the jury room? - Law Report - Apple Podcasts
The jury in mushroom cook Erin Patterson’s triple murder trial has retired to deliberate the verdict, guilty or not guilty. But what happens in there behind closed doors? When they retire to the deliberation room, should they leave all of their personal beliefs and prejudices at the door? And is this even possible? How does it work? In this episode from our special series Inside the Jury Room which first aired in 2018 Damien Carrick sets out to find the answer.
High Court of Australia - list of business for sittings in Canberra - commencing on 5 August 2025 and Perth - commencing 12 August 2025.
ln this episode, Foley’s List Barristers Emma Peppler and Eliza Bergin provide a crucial update on the implementation of Victoria's Environment Protection Act 2017. They discuss recent developments in Supreme Court judgments and Tribunal decisions, as well as key features of EP Act proceedings within the Tribunal.
A number of fresh Exhibits have been added to our Kumanjayi Walker Coronial Inquest website, ahead of next week's handing down of the Findings in Yuendumu agd.nt.gov.au/attorney-gener…
— NT Courts (@CourtsinNT)
3:46 AM • Jul 3, 2025
Got feedback or suggestions? Shoot us a message [email protected]