Daily wrap
Hundreds of young women were allegedly asked to work before and after their rostered hours, denied bathroom breaks and told to do piercings in store with just two hours’ training.
Editor’s picks
Lewis v Estate of Juan Martinez [2025] NSWCA 2 - NSW Caselaw (dispute relating to an expulsion from the HWLE partnership)
“Given the success of some of these programmes [e.g. Married at First Sight], and the way in which they generate discussion and debate, particularly on social media, the reality (pardon the pun) is that an employee’s appearance on these shows could conceivably cause the kind of harm to the interests of the employer contemplated by Rose v Telstra Corporation.”
International
[1] These appeals concern the court’s jurisdiction to prohibit the publication of the names of the judges who have decided particular cases in the past. The question arises in the context of historic care proceedings and private family law proceedings (the historic proceedings) relating to Sara Sharif (Sara), who was brutally murdered by her father and step-mother in early August 2023. The conclusions we reach may have wider significance.
Like our free newsletter? The best way to support us is to tell your colleagues about our newsletter!
We love feedback - [email protected]