• Headnote
  • Posts
  • Son of former HCA justice appointed to NSWCA

Son of former HCA justice appointed to NSWCA

Richard McHugh SC, the son of Michael McHugh, has been appointed to the NSW Court of Appeal

In partnership with

Was this email forwarded to you?

Sign up for our free daily email newsletter at headnote.com.au

Daily wrap  

All your news. None of the bias.

Be the smartest person in the room by reading 1440! Dive into 1440, where 3.5 million readers find their daily, fact-based news fix. We navigate through 100+ sources to deliver a comprehensive roundup from every corner of the internet – politics, global events, business, and culture, all in a quick, 5-minute newsletter. It's completely free and devoid of bias or political influence, ensuring you get the facts straight.

  • How do lawyers fare as Presidents and Prime Ministers? - Law Society Journal
     

  • Secession - Can a State or person secede from Australia? - Anne Twomey - YouTube

    This video answers two questions from viewers. The first is why Western Australia failed in its attempt to secede from Australia in the 1930s. The second is whether a State or a person can secede from Australia today.
     

  • Victorian Legal Services Board v Kuksal (Judiciary Act and Charter Notices) [2024] VSC 461 (7 August 2024)

    “ Mr Kuksal asked me to take judicial notice of a report referred to on 3AB radio ‘earlier this week’ that ‘there is a 30 per cent public confidence in the judiciary in Victoria’.”
     

  • Download - Rethinking 'On Just Terms': Commonwealth v Yunupingu - Lael K Weis and Rosalind Dixon

    “Commonwealth v Yunupingu raises a number of constitutionally significant issues concerning the scope of the Commonwealth Parliament’s power under s 51(xxxi) of the Australian Constitution and its relationship to the territories power in s 122. One issue that is not directly raised by the questions before the High Court of Australia, but that will nevertheless inform the Court’s answers, concerns the meaning of ‘on just terms’. Is ‘on just terms’ a narrow and inflexible

    requirement to provide full market-based compensation? Or does it permit a broader and more flexible approach to determining the obligations of the Commonwealth and territory governments, which would allow for structural reparations and non-pecuniary remedies? We suggest that a broader and more flexible approach is generally to be preferred as a matter of both principle and prudence and that such an approach is especially relevant for the Court as it considers the consequences of its answers to the questions before it.”
     

We welcome your feedback, which you can send to [email protected]