- Headnote
- Posts
- Tony McAvoy SC appointed to conduct EDO review
Tony McAvoy SC appointed to conduct EDO review
Following criticisms by Charlesworth J in a recent case brought against Santos, the EDO has appointed Tony McAvoy SC to conduct an internal review
Know someone that might be interested in our email newsletter?
Daily wrap
EDO appoints eminent First Nations barrister to lead process review - Environmental Defenders Office
EDO hires silk to review ‘made-up’ Barossa pipeline case [AFR paywall]
Tony McAvoy, SC, will review the “processes” of the Environmental Defenders Office after harsh criticism by a judge.
AFL faces years of litigation over ‘messy’ concussion lawsuits, court hears | AFL | The Guardian
a copy of Kennett J’s judgment here - Tredders Investments Pty Ltd as trustee for Warren Tredrea Trust v Channel 9 South Australia (No 3) [2024] FCA 233
Claim law firm Gadens knew about Blue Sky attack in advance [The Australian paywall]
Former Blue Sky boss Mark Sowerby’s claim against those who “conspired” to undermine the company says there is evidence law firm Gadens knew of the short attack in advance.
Regulator loses key crypto case in court [The Australian paywall]
In a heavy blow, Australia’s corporate regulator has lost one of its key court cases targeting the regulation of cruptocurrencies.
‘Huge overstep’: row over legal diversity training [The Australian paywall]
Barristers would be required to attend ‘equality and wellbeing’ seminars in order to continue to work, under a proposal backed in the ACT, Victoria and Tasmania.
Editor’s picks
The Administrative Review Tribunal: A promising start — Australian Public Law
The Fog of Law - Section 137 of the Evidence Act on Apple Podcasts
Legal GenAI Around the World: Australia + New Zealand - Centre for Legal Innovation - YouTube
The lawyers working themselves to death [AFR paywall]
The mental health of lawyers is under the spotlight following the death in London of a Pinsent Masons partner, who worked 18-hour days in the months before her death.
“[1] Red Hill Restaurant (Red Hill) serves hotpot. On its menu Red Hill specifies that a minimum of two diners are required to order this dish. Mr Zhang alleges that this requirement or policy amounts to indirect marital status discrimination as it is less likely that a single person would be dining with another person who is prepared to share the cost of a hotpot meal…”
Proper test for permitting prosecution to reopen prosecution case
— High Court (Australia) Trivia (@HighCourtTrivia)
5:38 AM • Mar 14, 2024
What did you think of today's newsletter?There is an option to provide written feedback once you've selected a response (any and all feedback welcomed) |
For enquiries contact [email protected]