- Headnote
- Posts
- Two HCA judgements handed down
Two HCA judgements handed down
HCA hands down Xerri and Lesianawai, solicitor handed 30 day prison sentence for contempt, Hamill J gives tips for advocates
Know someone that might be interested in our email newsletter?
Daily wrap
Links to yesterday’s HCA judgment found below:
Xerri v The King. Judgement summary here.
Lesianawai v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs. Judgement summary here.
NSW prosecutors to launch rape audit [The Australian paywall]
“Senior prosecutors will audit every sexual-assault matter currently committed for trial in NSW after a spate of criticism from state judges who said ‘meritless’ rape accusations were being brought before the court by prosecutors.”
Former ACT DPP Shane Drumgold says Sofronoff findings ‘tainted’ [AFR paywall]
Lehrmann prosecutor Shane Drumgold teaches law at University of Canberra [Canberra Times paywall]
a copy of the decision can be found here - SafeWork NSW v Qantas Ground Services Pty Ltd (No. 4) - NSW Caselaw
No prison sentence for trucking boss charged over Melbourne's Eastern Freeway tragedy - ABC News
Al Muderis patient denies ‘exaggerating problems’ in email [SMH paywall]
“Mark Urquhart was grilled by the surgeon’s barrister Sue Chrysanthou, SC, over statements he made when he ceased being a patient.”
the matter is being live streamed here - Federal Court of Australia
Ernst and Young partner wins court fight to keep his name suppressed [The Australian paywall]
“A former Ernst and Young tax partner has won a court fight to keep his name suppressed for now as he faces allegations of profiting $700,000 off a tax exploitation scheme”
Editor’s picks
Victorian Legal Services Board v Bowers-Taylor (No 4) [2024] VSC 72 (29 February 2024)
solicitor handed 30 day prison sentence for contempt (suspended for two years on conditions)
[54] The solicitor made some ambitious – perhaps misguided and inappropriate – submissions as to the reasonableness of Mr Zhura’s “reckless” conduct in committing the sexual touching offences. These submissions were based on the place and circumstances in which the offences occurred. While the solicitor, who is not a beginner, said he would not want to be “misheard” on the issue and emphasised the obvious fact that any “young lady” has “a right to be out in these clubs and do what they want to do and behave as they wish”, he went on to submit that such venues are “sexually charged arenas”. He said they were places where “people go to meet other people”. He sought to draw a contrast between a man groping a woman on a dancefloor and doing so on a train or at the Woolworth on a Sunday morning. The lawyer argued, while he “struggle[d] with the choice of words to describe this”, that “[i]t is the sort of contact people do make in those clubs and in many other circumstances would have been consented to.” This led to a submission that Mr Zhura’s recklessness as to consent was “less unreasonable” in the context of him being on a dancefloor in a nightclub.
[55] It must be emphasised that the facts were that Mr Zhura laid his hands on women with whom he had no previous conduct. He had not spoken to any of the three women he chose to grope and had not been dancing with them. Their first contact was when he touched them from behind. It is probably unnecessary to say this, but I will add that where an advocate struggles to find the words to make a submission such as this, it may be a strong indication that the submission ought not to be made at all. I also emphasise that nothing in the submissions made by Mr Zhura orally to the Magistrate, or in writing to this Court, even hinted that the venue in which these incidents occurred provided any justification or mitigation whatsoever.
ICC issues arrest warrants for top Russian commanders - BBC News
Murray Gleeson (ex-CJ, HCA) has retired from the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal
— High Court (Australia) Trivia (@HighCourtTrivia)
2:08 AM • Mar 6, 2024
Want to know what's happening in legal GenAI in your region and around the world too? Well we have THE series for you and we're kicking it off in Australia + New Zealand next week - woohoo! You can register for free here: bit.ly/LGAI-OzNZ12324.
— CLI (@Legalpreneurs)
5:25 AM • Mar 6, 2024
Can a corporate emanation of a foreign country be subjected to winding up proceedings in Australia?
— High Court (Australia) Trivia (@HighCourtTrivia)
6:38 AM • Mar 6, 2024
What did you think of today's newsletter?There is an option to provide written feedback once you've selected a response (any and all feedback welcomed) |
For enquiries contact [email protected]