• Headnote
  • Posts
  • Which courts and judges are fastest?

Which courts and judges are fastest?

The Australian Financial Review compiles data on 10 years of commercial judgments from the NSWSC, VSC and FCA and compares the time taken to deliver judgments by individual judges and the courts as a whole.

Daily wrap  

Like our newsletter?

Chances are, someone you know will too.

  • Australia’s fastest (and slowest) commercial judges revealed [AFR paywall]

    A Financial Review analysis of thousands of court cases involving companies has uncovered vast differences in how long it takes to reach a judgment.
     

  • Law firms take more graduates even as AI does the grunt work [AFR paywall

    Using generative AI for junior-level work is now standard across the country’s largest law firms, but the overriding need for accuracy in legal work means graduates remain in high demand.
     

  • Commencement of the new National Access to Justice Partnership | Our ministers – Attorney-General’s portfolio

    Today, the new $3.9 billion National Access to Justice Partnership 2025-30 (NAJP) commences, replacing the National Legal Assistance Partnership 2020-25 and delivering a critical increase of $800 million in funding over 5 years from 2025-26 to the legal assistance sector. This is the largest ever Commonwealth investment in legal assistance.
     

  • Ethical and costs considerations of using AI - Law Society Journal
     

  • Pens down! Government records in the WhatsApp age - Anne Twomey - YouTube

    This video discusses government record-keeping, including when it is appropriate to put pens down, why it is important to keep government records of decision-making, and why care needs to be taken about who makes a record and how it is protected and stored, especially in relation to sensitive and security matters. To this extent it ties in with the investigation into the Dural Caravan incident and the 'pens-down' briefings that were held.

    The video also discusses how the lack of access to government records can lead to false precedents being asserted and the distortion of history.

    It ends by discussing the use of messaging apps by politicians and public servants, often as a means to by-pass formal record-keeping. It notes that these messages have been treated by the Information Commissioner and National Archives as Commonwealth records, if they concern Commonwealth business, and therefore have to be treated in the same way as other government records.

     

Got feedback or suggestions? Shoot us a message [email protected]